smoaksignal.com
  • Home
  • Macayla & Battens
  • Photos
    • Macalaneous
    • Camp New Hope
    • Us
    • Adoption
    • Washington D.C.
    • Siblings
    • Hilton Head 2013
    • Israel 2015
  • Links & Resources

Day 2: What Makes You Angry?

12/18/2014

2 Comments

 
Picture
Does the Gospel of Luke have a blatant historical error in recording Jesus' birth? 
The fact a census was controversial for first-century Jews may provide an answer...
Joseph and Mary went to Bethlehem because of a census when "Quirinius was governor of Syria." This is a problem since he was "governor" of Syria in 6 A.D. The Gospels state Jesus was born during Herod the Great's reign which ended eight years earlier in 4 B.C. 
Is God's word in error? Was Jesus born during Herod's reign or Quirinius' governorship? Do such questions make believers angry?

Picture
On the first day, the kids learned that the first-century Jews tended to be cautious about a census, especially a Roman one. The previous post also mentioned some of the biblical issues with a census in the Jewish mindset of the time (and even in modern times). This dynamic may actually help us with the timeline problem. (See "Was Luke Mistaken" below.) 

The census brought up the issue of to whom the Jews "belonged" and who was in control. They were God's people, not Rome's, not Caesar's, and not Quirinius. The kids were challenged to think about to whom they belong. They may get angry over things they can't control in this world, but they need to remember that God is bigger than anything they face. 


As a reminder of this part of the story, and the Jewish revolt with a census, the kids got an Angry Birds Star Wars Wii game. What better way to think about defeating imperial oppression than slingshotting birds at Darth Hog!


Was Luke Mistaken?

Picture
Luke 2:2 says this was the "first" census of Quirinius. This would indicate there were other censuses later. Based on some Roman texts found in the 1920's, this "first census" could have taken place around 7/6 B.C. (notice B.C.). Ten years later, 6 A.D. a census mentioned by Josephus occurred and revolt broke out. In other words, the census of 6 A.D. may have been a second or third during Quirinius' official duties in the region. Luke 2:2 also states (in the Greek) that Quirinius was "governing" in Syria, not the noun "governor." Quirinius had duties in Syria at the time of Jesus' birth, but later had an official position.

The arguments that Luke is inaccurate date to the mid-19th century, but since then we have discovered new evidence that shows Luke was not as mistaken as once thought. The Roman records mentioned above shows frequent censuses took place in various places of the Roman Empire, and at times, across the whole of the empire as well. This is the kind to which Luke refers. 

2 Comments
Mike Lombardi
7/10/2018 07:49:10 am

Your argument is mistaken, the Bible says that Quirinius was governor "when taxing was first made", however the first verse in Luke 2:1 says that Mary and Joseph being Jews had to go be taxed by Caeser Augustus. (This took place every 14 years).

Reply
Jeff Smoak
7/10/2018 11:36:02 am

Sorry, I'm not sure I follow your point. Luke says that Jesus was born when Herod the Great was king of Judea (Lk 1:5) and Quirinius was governing Syria (Lk 2:2). Some scholars argue that Luke got his facts wrong based on Josephus’ account (Antiquities 17.342-344, 355; 18.1-4). Josephus was writing around the same time as Luke. According to Josephus’ account, Quirinius was not governor until 10 years after Herod died. Herod died in 4 BC and Quirinius was not the Governor of Syria until about 6 AD, and he conducted a census then. That census started a revolt among the Jews (referenced in Acts 5:37).

Roman records indicate censuses occurring on a 14 year cycle, but there are references to other census activity outside of that cycle in various regions around the empire. See both John H. Rhodes, “Josephus Misdated The Census of Quinirius,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 54.1 (March 2011) 65-87 and John Lawrence, “Publius Sulpicius Quinirius and the Syrian Census,” Restoration Quarterly 34 (1992) 193-205. Ancient sources like Josephus and Luke do not give us enough details to truly compare the data for a clear picture of the timeline, at least not the way modern Westerners would prefer it.

The overall point I am making is that Luke is reliable, Scripture is reliable, and the historical stage was set for the arrival of Christ.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Jeff Smoak

    Archives

    January 2017
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    August 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011

    Old Blog

    Category

    All
    Adoption
    Anxiety
    Battens
    Christians
    Death Of A Child
    Discipleship
    Parenting
    Special Needs

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Macayla & Battens
  • Photos
    • Macalaneous
    • Camp New Hope
    • Us
    • Adoption
    • Washington D.C.
    • Siblings
    • Hilton Head 2013
    • Israel 2015
  • Links & Resources